Year 5, Day 331 - 11/27/13 - Movie #1,592
BEFORE: It's
raining today in NYC, which would only be a problem if it were a big
travel day or something. I'm fortunate that I still live within driving
distance of my parents, relatively speaking, so we don't have to drive
anywhere until tomorrow morning. I spent about a decade meeting up with
my parents on Thanksgiving at my aunt and uncle's house in Rockland
County, and I feel that all those years of holiday travel have given me
something of a pass - now for Thanksgiving I can choose where I want to
go, or to choose nowhere if I want. But after another three years of
driving out to Long Island to spend the day with my wife's brother's
in-laws, this time we're going to drive up to New Haven, which had the
foresight to position itself roughly halfway between NYC and Boston, and
meet up with my parents for lunch tomorrow. One of New Haven's finer
restaurants (I hope) will be providing the food, my mother and I can
always cook a turkey together for Christmas.
I had the
foresight about 6 months ago to buy two pairs of sneakers instead of
one, which came in quite handy when the weather forced me to admit that
I've worn some considerable holes in the first pair. It's like I bought
myself a gift on layaway. Speaking of gifts, I've got to get moving on
Christmas stuff. This Friday simply MUST be the day where I pick the
tracks for my Christmas mix CD, and then comes the dubbing and the
labelling and the mailing of cards and CDs. Then I've got to make lists
(I love lists...) of gifts and where to look for them, and then there
will be a flurry of internet ordering - you won't catch me at the mall
on Black Friday, I assure you. But after one more film I've got to put movies on hold to catch up on holiday preparations.
Linking
from "The New World", two actors carry over - Christian Bale and Irene
Bedard, which is kind of amazing considering that both movies cover
almost exactly the same material.
THE PLOT: An English soldier and the daughter of an Algonquin chief share a
romance when English colonists invade seventeenth-century Virginia.
AFTER:
Once again, DisneyCorp. has seen fit to whitewash history. Of course,
with any life portrayed on screen, there are decisions to be made about
what to leave in and what to take out, so no biopic can ever be
considered complete, unless the running time matches the person's
natural lifetime. But with the story of Pocahontas it's pretty telling
what was depicted, and what wasn't.
First off, even
though it was the first Disney animated feature to be based on a real
person, being the chief's daughter made her technically a princess, so
you just know that's why DisneyCorp. was eager to tell her story.
Nothing like holding up another princess for little girls to aspire
becoming someday... OK, so she's not Caucasian, which makes it seem
like a step forward, but is it really? She is depicted as a woman who
is unable to define herself other than through her future husband, so to
me that's a big red flag, and a sign that we haven't really progressed
as fast and as far as one might think. Some stories maintained that she
had a husband in the tribe before she fell in with John Smith, but of
course they're going to just sweep that under the rug for a kid's
story. Additionally, history estimates her age as 12 or 13, not as an
older teen as depicted here - we can't show cradle-robbing, now can we? (also, she probably would have walked
around topless, but I understand some concessions must be made for a
kiddie film...)
Similarly, this story only covers
the period that includes Pocahontas meeting Smith, their romance and
tours through the animated Virginia countryside, and then their parting
after Smith is injured and forced to return to England. Man, that's a
hell of a long ambulance ride. At least in this version Smith doesn't
feed her the "I couldn't call you, I was dead" line. But there's no
mention of the love triangle that includes John Rolfe - because god
forbid that a kid's film suggest that relationships are at all
complicated. Nope, you meet your true love, and if you screw it up, you
don't get another shot. That ship has sailed - literally, it's leaving
with the tide.
The relationship between Pocahontas and
Rolfe constitutes the first interracial marriage in American history.
Doesn't it seem like that might be the more powerful story? Shouldn't
that be celebrated and depicted, instead of her dalliance with John
Smith? Although it was the first interracial romance seen in a Disney
film, I guess that's something. (Ah, I'm being told that Disney did produce a sequel, in which Pocahontas meets Rolfe and subsequently travels to London. Never mind. Carry on.)
Honestly,
though, no one really knows the true nature of the relationship between
Pocahontas and Smith. Smith wrote his journals in the third person, so
we don't get a lot of insight into where his head was at. Seems like
he was kind of ambivalent about it, if you ask me. You'd think if he
was tapping that, he'd at least brag about it. But it was a different
time, when some men were gentlemen, I guess. The first account of their
romance didn't appear until 1803, and that's quite a distance to be
speculating from.
As for Smith, "The New World" made
allusions to his mutinous behavior on the way to the New World, but this
film depicts him jumping overboard to save a comrade. That's quite a
discrepancy - but everything's conjecture, really. However, it's just
so blatant that everything was made to fit a particular formula, one
where heroes are good and villains are bad and there are no gray areas
in-between.
The other obvious complaint is that there
are too many sidekicks - about three too many - but that's pretty
standard for a modern Disney film. Really, everything they do is a
distraction, which means that DisneyCo. considers kids to be about as
intelligent as a housepet. "Hey, look over here!" is the overall
effect, because we don't believe in the ability of youngsters to pay
proper attention to the main storyline. And they wonder why so many
kids have HDAD these days - can anyone tie the growth of this condition
to the increase in animated sidekicks? There was even supposed to be a
fourth sidekick, a turkey named Redfeather, voiced by John Candy, but
when he passed away the role was not recast, and in fact all of the
animals lost the ability to speak English at that point.
Yes,
the original plan was to have the cutesy raccoon, pug dog AND the
hummingbird speak English, which would have made "Pocahontas" just as
non-sensical as "Madagascar" or "The Little Mermaid" or any of the
others - I suppose it's a step forward that they merely make animal
noises here, but I think it would have been a bigger step if their roles
were reduced or even eliminated entirely.
On top of
that, the name "Pocahontas" is spoken way too many times. After a
character is introduced, there's not usually much reason for stating
their name over and over - it almost seems like time-filler here, or an
admission that most characters don't have anything else constructive to
say. Pocahontas herself even starts sentences with it, which seemed
quite odd because why would she address herself before speaking to
another person?
Also starring the voices of Mel
Gibson (last seen in "The Bounty"), David Ogden Stiers (last heard in
"Hoodwinked Too: Hood vs. Evil"), Russell Means, Linda Hunt (last seen
in "She-Devil"), Billy Connolly (last seen in "The X-Files: I Want to
Believe"), Gordon Tootoosis (last seen in "Legends of the Fall").
RATING: 4 out of 10 shovels
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment