Tuesday, December 24, 2019

The Grinch

Year 11, Day 358 - 12/24/19 - Movie #3,400

BEFORE: For nearly twelve months now, I've planned out my chains -
299 films watched and just one remains.

Though I've wrapped my last presents on this Christmas Eve,
There's just one more hurdle before I can leave.

Scarlett Estevez carries over from "Daddy's Home 2"
And I can drive up to Boston right after this review.

(You're probably wondering, "Can he do this in rhyme?"
And I think I can manage if I have the time.)

So here's the last film of Two Thousand Nineteen,
a familiar story about a villain who's green.


FOLLOW-UP TO: "How the Grinch Stole Christmas" (Movie #360)

THE PLOT: A grumpy Grinch plots to ruin Christmas for the village of Whoville.

AFTER: Back in the 70's I was a pre-teen,
So this is a story I've already seen.

But some people felt that old version was dated,
So in 2017 a new film was created.

Or perhaps you're a bit younger than I was,
and you remember the version where Jim Carrey wore fuzz.

Either way, I question whether this update was needed,
Because really, the same story's just being repeated.

There's a Grinch who hates Christmas and so he attacks
the village of Whoville with his faithful dog, Max.

He sneaks into houses like Santa in reverse
and steals all their presents to make their lives worse.

The Whos wake to find that they've got nothing left
After the Grinch's long night of theft.

But instead of killing their Christmas spirit
The Whos sing out loudly, from afar he can hear it.

He learns that his heart was two sizes too small
Then he brings their stuff back, and they all have a ball.

So now it's in CGI, hooray, whoopee -
From the people who brought you "Despicable Me".

I don't think hip-hop music makes the film stronger,
But I have to admit that it does feel longer.

(If you think about it, Dr. Seuss made it happen
Before there was even a thing they call rappin'.)

The voice-work is fine, the narration's OK
But I think the new sub-plots are just there to delay.

Cindy-Lou sets out to trap Santa Claus -
She really wants to talk to him, well, just because.

I think it also behooves me to mention
The Grinch falls a lot, just to hold kids' attention.

They also added a reindeer named Fred -
Great, another sidekick, shoot me in the head.

The Grinch also has some crazy devices
But beyond that, there aren't too many surprises.

The Grinch's back-story was a new deviation
And I'll have to admit that it gave motivation.

I'm just glad that it's over, and I'm still alive.
And I'm feeling generous, so I'll give it a five.

That's it, I'm done, no more movies this year.
I should be packing my bags, why am I still here?

I'll be back in a week for my annual shakedown
As long as I don't have a Christmas breakdown.

I'll crunch all the numbers, try to make some sense
From the films of this year that were so intense.

Three hundred films, all linked by actor -
Quality often wasn't the determining factor.

Next week, I'll come back and review my creation
But for now, I think I've earned my vacation.

My list is still filled with movies a-plenty
So, God help me, I'll start over in 2020.

(Forgive me for aping the great Dr. Seuss -
I'm not so original, that's my excuse.)

Also starring the voices of Benedict Cumberbatch (last heard in "Mowgli: Legend of the Jungle"), Cameron Seely (last seen in "The Greatest Showman"), Rashida Jones (last seen in "Tag"), Kenan Thompson (last seen in "Going in Style"), Angela Lansbury (last seen in "Mary Poppins Returns"), Tristan O'Hare, Ramone Hamilton, Sam Lavagnino, Pharrell Williams (last seen in "Michael Jackson's Journey from Motown to Off the Wall") and Pentatonix.

RATING: 5 out of 10 cups of coffee

Monday, December 23, 2019

Daddy's Home 2

Year 11, Day 357 - 12/23/19 - Movie #3,399

BEFORE: Just one more film in my 2019 chain after this one - I'm bringing this year in for a landing right on Christmas Eve tomorrow, with the second of two Christmas-themed movies.  I love it when a plan comes together...

Will Ferrell carries over from "Holmes & Watson", and this is his third appearance for the year, which is my cut-off, so he's going to qualify for my year-end countdown, at nearly the last minute.  Mel Gibson and John Lithgow also now make the cut, and so does comedian Bill Burr.  (Sorry, Mark Wahlberg...)


FOLLOW-UP TO: "Daddy's Home" (Movie #2,484)

THE PLOT: Having finally gotten used to each other's existence, co-Dads Brad and Dusty must now deal with their own intrusive fathers during the holidays.

AFTER: They never say in the film where this story takes place, probably because they want people to feel that it could happen in THEIR state, or even their town.  Any place that gets snow in the winter and is a 4 or 5 hour drive from a ski resort would qualify - that's probably the whole upper half of the U.S, plus places like L.A.  But a little research on IMDB and Wikipedia tells me that they filmed this in Massachusetts, the ski town was Great Barrington in the Berkshires, and the other parts of the film were shot around Boston, in towns like Framingham, Wellesley, Concord, Quincy and Cambridge.  I grew up around there, very close to Framingham and I've been to most of those other towns at one point or another.  Mark Wahlberg never lost his Bah-ston accent, so this tracks with the story.  The airport seen in the film is probably Logan, if it's not just a set.

This doesn't really impact my enjoyment of the film, but I am headed up that way in just a couple days - we'll drive up to suburban Boston on Christmas Eve, with our annual stop at Foxwoods Casino in Connecticut.  This is our tradition, we've been doing it for at least a decade, though only in the last few years have we clued my parents in on our casino stop.  My mother would always be busy doing church stuff on 12/24, so she'd say, "Be sure to eat something on the trip up, when you get here it could be too late to order something..." Don't worry, Mom, I know where there's a solid buffet, and it's within view of some slot machines.  With a little luck, this holiday trip will pay for itself - it's happened before.  And even if I don't win on the slots, I'll make a killing at the buffet.

But today's film is all about breaking with tradition, in a positive way.  In the previous film, Brad and Dusty came to terms with their new-era post-divorce family, setting aside their differences for the sake of their shared kids.  Biological Dad Dusty and step-Dad Brad realize, however, that their daughter is still complaining about Christmas, and tells the whole school assembly that Christmas now is better than when she had "no dad", but it's still not as good as it used to be.  So the co-dads come up with an idea to have a "Together Christmas", celebrating with everyone in one house so the kids don't have to shuttle back and forth, or see one parent on Christmas Eve, the other on Christmas Day, and so on.  (I've got to call NITPICK POINT #1 here, because everyone and his uncle knows that this is how we all placate children of divorced parents, by pointing out that they now get to have TWO Christmases, with double the presents.  Did little Megan not get the memo on this point?)

But before Brad and Dusty can even figure out whose house they're going to hold the "Together Christmas" in, and who's going to cook what, they're visited by their fathers Don and Kurt, aka "Pop-Pop" and "El Padre", and this throws a couple of monkey-wrenches into the whole plan.  Don and Kurt are like even greater caricatures of the extremes their sons represent, so now we have super-sensitive Don and super-macho Kurt.  Don's a retired mail-carrier who kisses his adult son on the lips (umm, yeah...) and Kurt's a former space shuttle astronaut still chasing younger women who thinks kids are coddled these days and still maintains the sexist attitudes of the 1950's.  It's basic liberal vs. conservative stuff here, it's not too hard to figure out where these two are on the political spectrum, so really they represent our country's current divided nature.  I'd wager one flew in from a blue state and one from a red state, right?

Many of us are about to visit our families for Christmas, or have them visit us, and so we may find ourselves in the same situation.  And even for those who share the same political views as our parents, when it comes to raising children the different generations have very different approaches, what was acceptable on or two generations ago may now be frowned upon, like physically disciplining children, for example.  For our parents or grandparents it was just the way things were done, and these days if you hit your kid (no matter how badly they're acting up in a restaurant) you'll be publicly vilified, if not arrested.  And that's where this film finds most of its humor that works, by pointing out that each generation is still dealing with the mistakes that their fathers made, and trying very hard not to make the same mistakes themselves.  (Congratulations, you get to make ALL NEW mistakes!)

Macho Kurt throws his weight around by making a unilateral decision to book a ski-house on AirBnb (more NP's about this to follow below) and then he attempts to sow contempt between Dusty and Brad, and in the end it's not that hard to do.  Kurt also believes in hunting for sport (forcing the family to re-consider its stand on gun control) and in letting kids fail at sports, because failure builds character.  He's not wrong about the sports thing, but just too many comedy films lately have poked fun at the whole "Everyone gets a participation trophy!" mentality, and many of us are already on the same page here, thinking that we're raising a generation of kids who aren't permitted to fail, so their egos are artificially inflated, and they never build up the mental scar tissue that enables them to deal with failure.  Treating kids harshly is wrong, but P.C. helicopter parents have swung the pendulum too far in the other direction - why can't our culture find a balance point here?

The very different men bond together, though, when they find that one of the kids in the house is "fiddling with the thermostat", which I can attest is nearly a capital crime in a New England household.  And "fiddling" is defined as any change made to the setting preferred by the dominant male figure in the family - even if we bumped the thermostat accidentally, my dad would freak out.  The only possible worse offense during the winter was holding the door open for too long and "letting all the heat out".  What's very out of character here is that Dusty, the more "macho" of the two male leads, seems to be the one afraid to discipline his child, perhaps because she's his step-daughter, can counter any argument with "You're not my REAL dad..." and her real dad is the size of a professional wrestler.  Still, even with all that, this seems out of character for Dusty - when that step-daughter clearly NEEDS some discipline in this situation - she believes that she is more important than the other people in the house, who are sweating profusely while trying to sleep!

Plus, NITPICK POINT #2, a kid from Generation Y likes to sleep with the windows open and the room temperature cranked up to 80 degrees?  I thought they were all about saving the planet, and that's not how you do that.  If anything, a modern pre-teen would be the one yelling at her parents about how their generation killed Mother Earth, and her generation's going to be the one that has to save it.  We've greated a generation of little Greta Thunbergs, and hopefully they can get rid of plastic straws and maybe build some solar panels, because the current adults aren't getting it done.  Even the ones who aren't really into conservation at least pretend to be, just so they can feel superior to their parents, so I couldn't find this obnoxious energy-wasting kid believable at all.  Instead of bargaining with her over the temperature, he should have pulled rank, or at least tried the argument about saving the planet.

Then the next day, the men are back at each other's throats - but wait, they were just all bonding over their shared fixation with maintaining a nightly household room temperature of 65 degrees!  Why didn't they bond over this, and realize that as dads, they all have so much in common that unites them and the matters that separate them are inconsequential by comparison?  I mean, come on, we all know that's where this is going to end up, but it really needs to be a gradual progression, you just can't have them seesawing back and forth, working together one day and tearing each other apart the next, right?  If anything's going to kill a screenplay, it's inconsistency.

Now, let's get back to that ski house - I say that NITPICK POINT #3 concerns decorating a house you rent on AirBnb - you wouldn't spend hundreds of dollars on lights and decorations, even if it is Christmas.  Also, guests would NOT be allowed on their host's roof to install them anyway, I'm pretty sure that's a violation of the AirBnb rules.  And most likely, even if the cabin is large enough, they would NOT be allowed to cut down a Christmas tree in the woods and bring it inside.  Who's going to clean up all the pine needles and the sap that leaks out of it?  Again, violation of the AirBnb terms of service, big time, unless the host specifically allows this, which I doubt.  There was some mention of how it might be against the rules in those woods to cut down a tree because it was a federal nature preserve, but this was just laughed off - I'd be more worried about getting that negative review on AirBnb for being bad guests in someone's HOME.

So the whole sight gag about the snow-blower getting caught in the Christmas lights - it never should have even COME to that, because nobody in their right minds would have strung up lights on a home that they're only renting for a few days.  (According to the "goofs" section of IMDB, this snowblower accident is impossible with modern snowblowers, anyway.). And WHERE was the host when all this was taking place?  Sorry, it doesn't work, try again.

Then there are at least a dozen threads and jokes that never go anywhere, they're just left dangling.  The voice-controlled shower, Karen's shoplifting habit, the woman Kurt picks up at the improv show - none of these things get properly followed up on, they go exactly nowhere, so WHY are they even there?  The family volunteering as a human nativity scene is almost another dead-end, except it leads to a snow-brawl where everyone's dressed as a Biblical figure.  Hmm, a little better, only it feels just as pointless as everything else.  The kids get drunk on eggnog, and STILL nobody disciplines them?  I'm starting to think that maybe the old ways are better, these kids are WAY out of control, only nobody can see it.

A Christmas Day blizzard forces everyone leaving town to turn back and the only thing to do in town is to go to the movies (when they SHOULD go back to the house they rented and clean up that giant Christmas tree...) and this probably pissed off all the Jewish people in town who spend every Christmas day catching a movie, then eating Chinese food.  Oh, right, there are no Jewish people in town, because this is a Christmas movie.  But they have a big Band-Aid sing-along in the theater lobby, and the management hands out free giant candy bars as snacks.  As if.

Everyone becomes fast friends by the end, and polar opposites liberal Don (Pop-Pop) and conservative Kurt (El Padre) even jet off to Vegas together.  They're like a new version of "The Odd Couple" or something - they'll be fine as long as they don't talk about politics.  Then Brad's mom arrives with HIS new step-dad, who happens to be a celebrity.  It's all well and good, I suppose, except my final NITPICK POINT is they chose a celebrity who's married in real life, so it's impossible for me to believe that he could be suddenly married to Brad's mom.  They couldn't think of a celebrity who's single?

Also starring Mark Wahlberg (last seen in "All the Money in the World"), Mel Gibson (last seen in "The Beaver"), John Lithgow (last seen in "Beatriz at Dinner"), Linda Cardellini (last seen in "Welcome to Me"), John Cena (last seen in "Daddy's Home"), Alessandra Ambrosio (ditto), Scarlett Estevez (ditto), Owen Vaccaro (last seen in "Mother's Day"), Didi Costine (last seen in "The Hollars"), Daniel DiMaggio with cameos from Bill Burr (last seen in "Gilbert"), Chesley Sullenberger (last seen in "Capitalism: A Love Story") and the voice of Liam Neeson (last heard in "Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker")

RATING: 4 out of 10 wild turkeys

Sunday, December 22, 2019

Holmes & Watson

Year 11, Day 356 - 12/22/19 - Movie #3,398

BEFORE: After this, I'm two films from the end of the year - so there's no way I'm changing up my chain now, I'm on this track to a Christmas film and even though other linking opportunities have presented themselves, I'm staying the course.  This is where I planned in July to be right now, and I'm going to see it through.  Three days to Christmas, and two more films to get my perfect year.

John C. Reilly carries over from "Ralph Breaks the Internet", and so does one actress who voiced one of the Disney princesses.  Reilly, of course, is already scheduled to make my year-end countdown because I already did a chain of four or five films with him, and I think she's also going to be a late addition to that list, because this marks her third appearance for the year.


THE PLOT: A humorous take on Sir Arthur Conan Doyle's classic mysteries featuring Sherlock Holmes and Doctor Watson.

AFTER: This is just the way life goes sometimes - one day you're watching the big blockbuster "Star Wars" movie, and just two days later, it's a throwaway Will Ferrell comedy that just isn't funny (for the most part...).  I often point out a big disparity with food, one day I find myself eating a spectacular meal at a fancy restaurant, and the next day for lunch, it's canned pasta. (I do like the Chef Boy-ar-Dee lasagna, though, which offends my wife's Italian heritage.).  Friday night I was enjoying a wonderful meal of braised short ribs at a diner in Queens, and the next day for lunch, I was making sandwiches with some leftover Treet (that's the spam-like luncheon loaf stuff that's not even as good as spam, God help me...)

This film is a lot like Treet - it's not even up to SPAM's level.  Oh, sure, you could do worse for lunch, you could accidentally some rancid meat or get food poisoning from some bad potato salad, there's nothing about Treet that will harm you or kill you, you just might not light the taste or the texture.  But if you've had fried bologna, and enjoyed that, maybe it's right up your alley.  (I put the slices of Treet on some sliced croissants my wife had baked, added some American cheese and honey mustard, and it wasn't too bad.  But then, I like to eat head cheese and other German cold cuts - leberkäse has a similar bologna-like texture.

And please note, there was the opportunity for a solid parody of the "Sherlock Holmes" novels, or even of the "Sherlock Holmes" films that starred Robert Downey Jr. - those things took themselves so damned seriously, were so pretentious that there's a lot to make fun of there.  Yeah, but this is not that parody, because it just devolves into a lot of dick jokes and vomit gags, making "Talladega Nights" look like a comedy masterpiece by comparison.  Ferrell and Reilly, I thought you guys were better than this, and I'm very disappointed to learn that I was wrong.

Let's start with the main concept - that maybe Sherlock Holmes isn't as smart as everyone thinks he is.  Again, there's the opportunity for some comedy there, Sherlock Holmes as a moron has some potential.  But this film puts that out there, and then just can't stick with it - because let's face it, how do you write that?  So then it has to backtrack and say, "Wait, he's NOT an idiot, he was right all along...", and then they have to bend the plot over backwards and sideways to ensure that that's the case.  So he's smart, then he's stupid, then he's smart again, only he still finds ways to act stupid, so now I don't know which end is up.  Inconsistency will KILL a film for me - PICK A FREAKIN' LANE!

There's the germ of a good idea, which is the only reason that I'm giving this film any points at all.  First there's the suggestion that maybe Watson is some kind of criminal mastermind, hiding in plain sight, gathering intel on Holmes from within the organization, feeding information to Moriarty, or perhaps even Moriarty himself.  God, I'd love to read a book or see a film that had that level of twist to it.  But it's a dodge here, Holmes is once again mistaken (because this happens during one of the segments of the film where he's temporarily stupid again, for no reason).  There is an agent close to Holmes working against him, and this might have also been a great reveal, except it's too little, too late, and then it sort of pales by comparison to the Watson idea.

There are manufactured love interests for both Holmes and Watson, and too much emphasis is placed on Holmes not understanding that Watson's girlfriend can be a doctor - OK, it's a little funny to make fun of how sexist the world used to be, but there still should be no place for sexism in a modern comedy.  Holmes' girlfriend is so dumb that she can't even speak, or so we're led to believe, so then why is he, a supposedly smart man, attracted to her?  And she was raised by feral cats?  It's another long joke with no real payoff, and there are dozens of them here.

The whole segment where Holmes and Watson think that they've accidentally killed the Queen - it comes out of nowhere, it goes on way too long, and again, there's no payoff.  It just sort of...stops, like the worst of Ferrell's SNL sketches.  PLUS it's not funny, not one bit of it.  Why, why, why?

The best thing I can say about this is that it was nice to see Coogan and Brydon working together again, and playing roles, not just sitting in a restaurant it Italy trying to figure out who can do a better Michael Caine impression.  Though if they made another sequel to "The Trip" I'll probably watch that one, too...

The other part I liked was the depiction of Holmes as a child, when after being bullied by his classmates, he uses his deductive reasoning powers to bust them all for their various sins and gets them all expelled.  Being the only student at school, he then gets full attention from all of the teachers and this explains his superior intelligence.  This also doesn't make too much sense, because any proper prep school would then find other students to fill its ranks, but it's a neat little twist in a Holmes origin story.  This is the only other part of the story that needed to be in a much better movie.

NITPICK POINT: The joke about characters sailing on the Titanic just plain doesn't work, because the "Sherlock Holmes" stories are set in the Victorian era, the late 1800's, and we ALL know what year the Titanic sailed, right?  Even in a nonsense comedy, the dates need to line up if the gags are going to work.  Same goes for listening to "Unchained Melody" on a victrola - this isn't "Airplane!".

Also starring Will Ferrell (last heard in "The Lego Movie 2: The Second Part"), Ralph Fiennes (ditto), Rebecca Hall (last seen in "The Dinner"), Rob Brydon (last heard in "Early Man"), Kelly Macdonald (also carrying over from "Ralph Breaks the Internet"), Steve Coogan (last seen in "Stan & Ollie"), Lauren Lapkus (last seen in "Girlfriend's Day"), Pam Ferris (last seen in "Matilda"), Hugh Laurie (last seen in "101 Dalmatians"), Bella Ramsey, Scarlet Grace, Noah Jupe (last seen in "A Quiet Place"), Braun Strowman, Hector Bateman-Harden, Codie-Lei Eastick, with cameos from Billy Zane (last seen in "Dead Calm"), Michael Buffer (last seen in "Creed II").

RATING: 3 out of 10 bites of an onion