Saturday, January 6, 2024
Quiz Lady
Friday, January 5, 2024
The Little Mermaid (2023)
Thursday, January 4, 2024
The Song of Names
Year 16, Day 4 - 1/4/24 - Movie #4,604
BEFORE: Tim Roth carries over from "The Wolfpack" and becomes the first person in 2024 to have three appearances, so there you go, he's made the end-of-year wrap-up list already, and 2024 is only days old. We're just getting started - who's going to win this year's race for the most appearances? I won't know until I watch my documentary chain, but based on a quick look at the cast lists, my initial bet would be on Elton John. But it's impossible to say, there's so much that hasn't been programmed yet.
I learned a few years back that it is simply IMPOSSIBLE to program a year's worth of movies in a continuous linked chain - however, it is POSSIBLE to program a month's worth of movies in a continuous linked chain, and if I can do that just 12 times in a row, then I've got a linked year, and I've done the "impossible". Now I find I can sometimes do 2 months at a time, and that just makes things a bit easier. But breaking down the year into chunks is really the key - once February's planned then I can do January, then if I can get to specific themed targets on St. Patrick's Day, Easter (maybe), Mother's Day, Father's Day and July 4, well the year's almost 2/3 over at that point. Then the Summer Doc Block gets me closer to October 1 and the horror chain begins, finally I can target Thanksgiving and Christmas and the year is over. It's simple, really.
Oh, yeah, I forgot to post my actor links for January - after Tim Roth's 3 films, these are the links that will get me to February 1: Jonah Hauer-King, Awkwafina, Joe Chrest, Toni Collette, Shamier Anderson, Laurence Fishburne, Cate Blanchett, Alec Baldwin, Sean Cullen, Samantha Morton, Brendan Fraser, Mark Hamill, Jimmy Tatro, Riki Lindhome, Don McManus, Jean Smart, Max Minghella, Dato Bakhtadze, Daniel Bernhardt and Claire Forlani, who will carry over to the first romance film. If you can read between the lines, you may see that there are three or four of LAST year's Oscar contenders in the mix for this month, I unfortunately don't have time for THIS year's Oscar hopefuls though.
THE PLOT: Several years after his childhood friend, a violin prodigy, disappears on the eve of his first solo concert, an Englishman travels throughout Europe to find him.
AFTER: Well, I just want to take this opportunity to remind everyone that Holocaust Remembrance Day is Saturday, January 27. Yeah, I looked it up, because I thought there was a slight chance it would be today, but it's not. But you have plenty of time to prepare for it, and watching this movie wouldn't be the worst choice that day. Who wants to watch "Schindler's List" again? Not me - Spielberg is a hack, anyway, did you know he never was officially hired at Universal, he just snuck off from the studio tour, found an empty office and set himself up there? By the time anyone realized he didn't officially work there, he was producing three features! That just isn't fair to other people who apply for jobs and have to interview for them, so really, he doesn't deserve any of the acclaim he's received over the years, it's fruit of the poison tree, and one day, you'll see, his films will have to be removed from the National Registry of Historic Films, because of this technicality, he was never officially hired by a studio. Honestly I'm shocked this isn't a bigger scandal than it should be, like do you think people who want to be police officers or fireman can just walk into the police or fire station, find a uniform that fits and then just start working there? No, no, no, this represents the total breakdown of society, we must have rules and order and you just can't start working somewhere, like a middle school or a hospital, so the same goes for a movie studio. So all of his films need to be thrown out, destroyed and removed from the box office records, Universal has to refund all those movie tickets sold, you'll see, and he'll have to give back his Oscars, mark my words.
So, yeah, watch this one instead, it's a fine film that imparts the weight of the Holocaust and the loss and anguish felt throughout the U.K. during World War II on its characters, especially a young Polish violinist, Dovidl Rapaport, whose father brings him to the U.K. right before the war starts, so he can study to become a concert violinist. It takes years of practice, apparently. He's offered a place to live with the Simmonds family while he studies, as Mr. Simmonds is involved in his training and has a son, Martin, who is about the same age. The two 9-year-old boys clash at first, but eventually become close friends, essentially brothers. Once the war begins, Dovidl gets no news about his family, other than they may have been deported to Treblinka, but he's not sure if they are alive or dead. This is problematic in the Jewish religion, because he's been instructed by his rabbi to not read the Kaddish for them, if he's unsure of this.
Much of this story is told out of sequence, but in the introduction we learn that Dovidl disappeared when he was 21, on the night of the big concert that he'd been working toward for 12 years. The mystery then becomes, what would make him vanish just before his music career was scheduled to finally take off? Was he injured on the way to the concert hall, or kidnapped or killed? Why practice for so many years, just to quit right before finally succeeding at this planned endeavor? His adopted brother, Martin, has wondered this for years, and we also follow him as an adult, years later, in the mid-1980's, when he learns some strange clues that could lead him to where Dovidl went after he disappeared. During a school concert where he's a judge, he sees a high-school student make the same gesture with his rosin bag as Dovidl always did, so he suspects that this boy learned violin from Dovidl, and then sets out to track him down.
The storylines are intertwined from then on, as the movie jumps between the 1940's, the year of the concert (1952 or so) and the mid-1980's, with Martin traveling from Warsaw to New York City in what may be a wild goose chase. And even if he was correct about where Dovidl went THEN, there's no real guarantee that he'd still be in any of those places, he could be anywhere. But after so much time, he still really needs to know what happened, and therefore, so do we. In the 1940's we see Martin and Dovidl dealing with the horrors of the war, in the 1952 scenes we see Dovidl renounce his Jewish faith, and then in the 1980's - well, you can probably guess whether Martin finds Dovidl, a simple scan of the cast list on IMDB can help you figure that one out.
But WHY he disappeared and HOW he learned about what happened to his family, and WHERE he went after that, well, that's all very relevant. It's also significant that he did return to his faith and his people, because that was such a big part of his character, and there are parts of his story that would be significant to anyone who survived the war and lost family during the war. The mystery part of the story is enough to make this interesting, and I can't say much about the device that the rabbis use to remember the names of the dead, except that I'm wondering if it's real or just a fictional device, and I can't say any more than that without giving too much away.
Also it's about how most people tend to be selfish at heart, and fall back into those patterns very easily, again and again. Martin still wants that concert that didn't happen in 1950 to happen, as if that's going to solve everything wrong in his life, and no, that's probably not going to happen. But we all want the wrongs of the past to be righted if possible, I suppose that's normal human nature. Dovidl similarly wants his family back, only that's not going to happen either, and everyone struggles with their sense of self, which, it turns out, is a force that is counter-balanced by being part of a faith-based community. We all have to find that balance, between wanting what we think is best for us and what might be best for the community, which does not, in fact, revolve around any one person. What good is it to be talented and famous, which is a benefit to the self, if it comes at the expense of the community?
And just like in "The Worst Person in the World", there might be times where you just want to burn your life to the ground and then disappear, go live in Montana or a housing project in New York where you don't have a job and are basically off the grid. Is that fair to the people who care about you? It might, over time, be the thing you need to do to feel human again, but it's not really fair to the community, is it? Where do you draw that line between self-expression and doing things for you vs. maintaining your relationships and fulfilling your obligations, even though you just feel like a cog in some giant machine? Is it better to take control of your own life and strike out in a new direction, or keep on doing the same thing day after day, year after year, because people are counting on you for things? Maybe I'm projecting a bit too much here, but that's what I got from this story.
Obviously, World War II was a terrible period in history for nearly everyone, as 9-year old Dovidl points out. He mentions there were thousands killed across Europe, every day, and history would never even record the names of most of those people. Then in those instances when you DO know their names, it's all just a bit too real, isn't it? I'm not going to draw any connections to the current war between Israel and Hamas, because I just don't know enough about it - and there are plenty of people getting in trouble for having strong opinions one way or the other, it's a cultural minefield right now. At least when we watch films about World War II we know who we're rooting for, right? Jeez, I know fascism's trying to make a comeback in several countries around the world, even the U.S., but can we please agree to try to not make the same mistakes again, at least?
Also starring Gerran Howell (last seen in "1917"), Misha Handley (last seen in "The Woman in Black"), Clive Owen (last seen in "The Informer"), Jonah Hauer-King, Luke Doyle, Stanley Townsend (last seen in "Happy-Go-Lucky"), Catherine McCormack (last seen in "The Weight of Water", Magdalena Cielecka, Saul Rubinek (last seen in "The Family Man"), Jakub Kotynski, Tamas Puskas (last seen in "Max"), Amy Sloan (last seen in "Head in the Clouds"), Marina Hambro, Steven Hillman, Sharon Percy (last seen in "Billy Elliot"), Viktoria Kay, Max MacMillan, Richard Bremmer (last seen in "Star Wars: Episode IX - The Rise of Skywalker"), Zoltan Schwartz, Julian Wadham (last seen in "Colette"), Istvan Darvas, Zsofi Toth, Joanna Caplan, Howard Jerome (last seen in "Lucky Number Slevin"), Chaim Paskesz, Pinchasz Weisberger, Daniel Mutlu, Jeffrey Caine, with a cameo from Eddie Izzard (last seen in "Six Minutes to Midnight")
RATING: 6 out of 10 naughty playing cards
Wednesday, January 3, 2024
The Wolfpack
AFTER: Surprisingly, there's a throughline - the first film of the year was about Julie, who (eventually) works as a photographer on a movie set, and "Bergman Island" was about a married pair of screenwriters/directors who, against all sense and reason, work together and bounce ideas off each other. (Sorry, it can't last, from what I've seen. Don't mix your work lives and your personal lives together.). And tonight's film is about a large family of sheltered teens in NYC who make their own knock-off versions of Hollywood movies. That's still filmmaking, right? So I'm on a thematic roll, unintentionally.
Tuesday, January 2, 2024
Bergman Island
Monday, January 1, 2024
The Worst Person in the World
Year 16, Day 1 - 1/1/24 - Movie #4,601
BEFORE: Happy New Year 2024, and Happy New Movie Year 16!
I suppose I'll have to explain why I'm coming back from break with a Norwegian dramedy that was Oscar-nominated two years ago for Best International Feature Film - did I lose my mind? Or am I just a glutton for punishment, setting myself up for a nearly impossible linking challenge? Did I put this film on my list as a whim, or was I influenced by the HEAVY publicity campaign for this film around Oscar time in 2022? I'm not sure...
Well, my process is the same as before, if you look at the films that kicked off my last few chains, which were all successful - in 2020 I started the year with "Whale Rider", which linked to just ONE other film on my list, via Cliff Curtis, to "Sunshine". In 2021 I started the year with "Parasite", a Korean film that linked to just ONE other film on my list, which was "Okja", from the same director, Bong Joon Ho. 2022 began with "Nomadland", which linked via Frances McDormand to just ONE other film on my list, "Miss Pettigrew Lives for a Day", and my first film in 2023 was "Narrowsburg", a documentary that linked to, you guessed it, just ONE other film on my list, via Paul Borghese and archive footage of Robert De Niro, to "The Family".
So, I went looking for other films that might fit the bill, something prominent but also perhaps obscure that linked to just ONE other film I'm tracking. I made a list of about 10 possible "one-linkables", the most famous was "CODA", the Best Picture winner, and I do want to see that, but it only linked to a horror movie, "Slender Man", so that didn't seem right for January. On to this film, which I had on my romance sub-list, however since it only links to, well, tomorrow's film, I would probably NEVER be able to work it into a month-long February romance chain - what would possibly be on the other side? It would be a dead-end. So it's off the romance list and it got moved into the lead-off position, the tricky thing then was coming up with a 28 to 30- long chain that would get me where I need to be on February 1. The fact that I moved forward with THIS film should tell you that yes, I was able to work one out - and with a couple additions I padded it out to 30.
Now, my annual (really) long-distance dedication, a lot of prominent actors and musicians passed away in 2023, so there's for sure TOO MANY to choose from. There are people who I watched documentaries about, like Tina Turner and Sinead O'Connor and Tony Bennett (he was in that Carl Reiner doc about people active in their 90's) and Robbie Robertson from The Band. Ray Liotta, who I just watched in "Cocaine Bear", Tom Wilkinson and Michael Gambon, Raquel Welch and Jane Birkin from classic 60's films, Richard Roundtree from the "Shaft" films and Alan Arkin from, well, everything. Piper Laurie from "Carrie" and "Twin Peaks" and Burt Young from the "Rocky" movies. Harry freakin' Belafonte and Melinda Dillon (the only person who could star in both "Close Encounters" and "A Christmas Story") and character actors like Lance Reddick and Andre Braugher.
But I have to dedicate the next year to Paul Reubens, who will be most missed here at the Movie Year. I kicked off 2018 with his film "Pee-Wee's Big Holiday" (Movie #2,801) and I was a big fan of his Saturday morning Playhouse show, and I even got to see him live on Broadway not TOO long ago. So it's been five years since he kicked off a Movie Year, then carried over to the next film, which was "Matilda". Sad to see you go, Pee-Wee, the playhouse won't be the same without you. Globey and Chairy and Magic Screen all miss you, too.
THE PLOT: The chronicles of four years in the life of Julie, a young woman who navigates the troubled waters of her love life and struggles to find her career path, leading her to take a realistic look at who she really is.
AFTER: Oh, it was SUCH a good call to watch this one after the ball dropped on New Year's Eve. The turning over of the calendar page is symbolic of starting over, the new year is full of possibilities and untapped potential, like literally ANYTHING can happen in 2024. Plus it's a time when people pass resolutions about ways they're planning to improve their lives, from spending more time at the gym to spending less time on their phone, or vowing that THIS is going to be the year they get that dream job or find new love or even just to come up with a new life plan or learn to be content with the path they're already on. Whatever happens or doesn't happen, the space between the years has come to be a time for reflection, if nothing else.
Julie is a medical student in Oslo who's become disenchanted with med school and transfers to psychology, and then a few months later decides that she'd rather be a photographer. Sure, it could happen, I know a lot of people maybe find medical school to be too tough, so many drop out. But photography? Her mother doesn't say it out loud, but clearly she thinks it's an odd left turn for her daughter. She also does some writing, and gets a job in a book store, you know, the one near the university, until she can figure out the photography career.
Her relationships sort of follow the same pattern over these four years - she starts a relationship with Aksel, a comic book artist who's 15 years older, and they move in together, but soon they start to clash over the idea of having a child. He's for it, but she's against it, as there are things she wants to do in life first, the problem is, she's not exactly sure what those things are. One night Julie crashes a wedding reception and hangs out with Elvind, a barista. They hit if off, but since they're both in relationships that seem to be working they engage in intimacy exercises (like smelling each other's sweat, or inhaling each other's cigarette smoke) but NOT sex. Because that would be weird, they only just met.
Julie then turns 30, and perhaps that's a trigger, because she finds herself dreaming about Elvind and falling out of love with Aksel, who's always complaining that his comic strip character "Bobcat" got turned into a movie and they sanitized it for kids. The American equivalent would maybe be the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles, which was a cool, gritty comic book back in the day before becoming a very safe cartoon. Elvind happens to come into the bookstore, and that's another trigger, because soon Julie's breaking up with Aksel and Elvind ditches his overly liberal girlfriend Sunniva who's all about vegetarianism, combating climate change and fighting for the rights of indigenous peoples. Yeah, good luck with all that. Julie doesn't want kids, Elvind doesn't want kids, everything seems to be back on track, it's just that the break-ups make Aksel and Elvind describe themselves as feeling like "The worst person in the world." I get that, break-ups are tough, whether you're the breaker or the breakee, when there's another person your girlfriend is seeing or even worse, when there's not. That means she just wants to break up with you because she can't stand you.
Oh, there's more heartbreak and anguish to come, because Julie learns she's pregnant, just before she finds out from Aksel's brother that he has incurable cancer. She goes to see him, but man, how awkward is it to go visit the man who wanted to have kids with her, and tell him that she's unexpectedly expecting? But this all feels REAL somehow, like this all maybe happened to someone the writers knew, from the inadvertent drug trip to the dream about running through town to get to the coffee shop. Renate Reinsve reminded me of some kind of Norwegian Rose Byrne, and I wonder why someone hasn't made an English-language version of this yet. Or is this already the Norwegian version of the "Bridget Jones' Diary" films?
A lot about this film spoke directly to me - like Aksel being older and realizing that the things he enjoyed when he was younger, like comic books, no longer held much appeal for him, but he still bought and read them out of habit. Yeah, I feel that. Plus my career's been stuck in neutral for some time, 30 years running the same animation studio, and even though I started a new second job two years ago in a college movie theater, there's not much room for advancement there, not unless I'm willing to wait a few years for someone to quit so I can move up. I'm actually doing well financially, when the theater is very busy I can work a lot of shifts and so my bank balance is back to pre-pandemic levels, but the animation director I work for is so far in debt after making a new feature that I'm convinced he's going to have to shut down the studio any day now. Looking for a new primary job after 30 years seems very stressful, and I wish I could just work part-time but I can't afford it. I'm too young to retire and too old to start something new, it seems.
But it seems the valid message here is that not all career paths are linear, same goes for relationships if you practice serial monogamy. There are times in life where you find yourself right back where you started, or in the same place but with a different person, or in the same place at a different company. Wait, didn't I just leave this scene? I guess wherever you go, well, there you are. So I'm trying to look on the bright side, I'm sure I wasn't the only person who lost a job because of the pandemic and had to scramble to find something else to do, and I'm damn sure I wasn't the only person to get divorced and had to put my life back together in a new way. There's something to be said for treating parts of your life like a farm field that has to lay fallow for a season or two so things can grow again - or treating your career like a forest, you might have to burn down part of it so the rest of it can thrive and grow back someday.
And if you DON'T know where you're going, as George Harrison once sang, then any road will take you there. But you'd better start soon, because you just don't know how long the journey will be. Look, when I was a kid I loved animals, and I thought I'd grow up to be a veterinarian, then I realized that meant operating on them, cutting in to them, and I realized that was not for me. Then I thought I'd be a pilot, but realized how tough THAT was - so OK, my Mom said I was good at impressions and I'd be the next Rich Little, which clearly the world didn't need. Music, singing a capella, I tried it for a while, and it's fun but not a solid career. Ah, but when filmmaking came into my head, I figured I'd cracked the case. Guidance counselors warned me against it because I wasn't the most social kid in high school, and filmmaking is all about being social and networking and getting along with people. Well, OK, they were right, I'm still not good at that, but I've had a career in independent filmmaking for 33 years, so who was more right in the end, them or me? I can stand on my record and if the ride ends tomorrow, I can still be proud of what I've done, but then I'll have to start something else, that's all.
Also starring Renate Reinsve, Anders Danielsen Lie, Herbert Nordrum, Hans Olav Brenner, Helene Bjorneby, Vidar Sandem, Maria Grazia Di Meo, Lasse Gretland, Karen Roise Kielland, Marianne Krogh, Thea Stabell, Deniz Kaya, Eia Skjonsberg
RATING: 6 out of 10 signed graphic novels
Sunday, December 31, 2023
Year 15 Wrap-up / Year 16 Preview
12/30/23
Things have been crazy here, behind the scenes at the Movie Year - but also kind of quiet. We had just a quiet Christmas at home, made lasagna again, which we started doing during the pandemic - but this year's was particularly tasty for some reason. We did a little Christmas shopping together, but AFTER the 25, we went out to an outlet mall on Dec. 28, which I highly recommend doing if you don't have family members expecting gifts on the day itself. We still have to buy some gifts for my sister's family in North Carolina, but other than that, the holiday was relatively stress free. Unlike work, which has been nothing BUT stress. Oh, the theater is closed for the semester break as usual, it's the other job that's got my stomach all in knots.
But I've determined that everything has to end at some point, so if that job goes away in the New Year because my boss can't seem to learn how to balance a checkbook, or understand that a successful business has to take in more money than it pays out, then I can just walk away after 30 years on the job. I have that power, and I've done it before when employers have run out of money and stopped paying me, it's just that this job represents a major chunk of my life and I've found that it's much easier to keep doing the things I'm doing rather than burn that part of my life down and start over, doing something else. My movie blog is somewhat similar, after 15 years it's almost easier to just keep doing it than to somehow find a way to STOP. What does it mean to stop, anyway? That just leaves you with a big hole in your life where that thing used to be, and then you're going to want to fill that space and time with something else, and god, that sounds exhausting, just deciding what's going to fill that void. Nope, it's easier to just put my head down and keep going, because that's what I know how to do.
Speaking of time, I suddenly find myself running out of it, the New Year is just two days away, how the heck did THAT happen? I have to go to a wake tonight for my wife's cousin, and tomorrow we're planning to fill some sandbags and place them against the basement door in the backyard to keep water from coming into our basement, since we don't get snow any more in December, just heavy rains that cause flash floods. So that leaves me with just a few HOURS to write the wrap-up post for 2023. Well, I'd better get started.
First, the format stats for 2023:
4 watched on iTunes
20 watched on Amazon Prime
7 watched on Hulu
8 watched on Disney+
5 watched on Tubi:
4 watched in theaters
0 watched on Peacock (seems about right)
5 watched on random sites
300 TOTAL
WINNER: "Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse"
"Marcel the Shell with Shoes On", obviously (no other contenders in this category)
WINNER: "Rebecca" (2020)