Wednesday, November 24, 2021

The Oath

Year 13, Day 328 - 11/24/21 - Movie #3,984

BEFORE: I could not have timed this better - but hey, this is what I do. I've arrived at my Thanksgiving film right on schedule, just as I've arrived at my parents' house in Massachusetts to get some kind of holiday dinner ready for them. They've made the move over to assisted living, at least for the winter, and they'll make some kind of decision in the spring about whether to move back to the house or to somewhere else, based mostly on my mother's health and/or mental condition. I've got a cousin who sleeps at their house a few days a week, when he's working in the area and not taking care of his kids, so he's sort of a caretaker for the house, this way we don't have to fully shut it down yet.

I could cook the usual big holiday dinner myself, with a big frozen turkey and making the sides from scratch, but that's SO much work - instead, I opted for a pre-cooked turkey breast dinner package from the local grocery store, with all the sides like potatoes and stuffing and green bean casserole, all just have heat-and-eat instructions. My wife and I picked that up today along with some cheese & crackers and an extra dessert, and all I have to do tomorrow is put some dinner plates together for my parents, and we'll deliver that to them around 5 pm, they're having Thanksgiving lunch provided by their facility.  It should all go pretty smoothly, and then we get to eat a holiday meal ourselves after that - the facility has rules in place right now that forbid us from eating the meal WITH them, but we can join them on Zoom and eat the meal together, sort of.

Jay Duplass carries over from "Manson Family Vacation".

THE PLOT: In a politically divided America, a man struggles to make it through the Thanksgiving holiday without destroying his family.

AFTER: I think years from now, people will be able to view this movie and be very aware of what year it was released, which was 2018, midway between the elections and the halfway point of the first (and hopefully ONLY) Trump administration. At the time we thought U.S. politics couldn't have been more divisive, only that was before mask mandates and vaccine mandates, Black Lives Matter protests and a failed insurrection. So now, three years later, the country's even MORE divided than it was then, to the point where "facts" tend to take on two different meanings, depending on which channel is reporting them.  

And that's exactly where this film lives, in a country where two different people watching two different news channels walk away with exactly opposite spins on the same events. Sound familiar? On one channel the insurrectionists are misguided morons supporting a lying loser, and on the other channel, they're our last defense against election fraud and a failed system. How can both things be true? What is "truth" now, anyway? Should the news be true or is it enough for it to be entertaining - while also pandering to people's more basic instincts?  And if this is wrong, what can be done to change it?      

This may be the perfect film for me to watch this week, because the story starts on Thanksgiving of one year, then skips forward to three days before Thanksgiving the NEXT year, and then ends on Black Friday. The President proposes that all Americans swear an oath of loyalty to the country, and many sign that oath right away, but then just as many Americans decide to either NOT sign the oath because of laziness or dissatisfaction with the opposing political party, while a very small, very vocal groups decides that such an oath seems to be in conflict with the U.S. Constitution, which guarantees citizens things like freedom of speech, and therefore also the power of dissent.  We've seen debates like this over the Pledge of Allegiance, because if kids in school are FORCED to recite it every morning, doesn't that seem to be in conflict with free speech?  Yes, of course we should love our flag, and the country for which it stands, but that also should be an individual decision that every citizen needs to make for themselves, and other answers should be possible.  

We have the right to protest every decision made by the government, however once a law is enacted, then not following that law has consequences, even if that's an imperfect law, or one we don't like. I might hate the law that says I can't smoke or drink alcohol in public, but that in itself is not enough to justify breaking the law. If I disagree, my time would be better spent trying to get the law revoked or changed.  Therefore, logically, if people in blue states disagree with mask or vaccine mandates, or people in red states disagree with the lack thereof, they're free to protest, but still must pay the penalty if caught not complying with local laws. 

And this brings me to Chris, the lead character in "The Oath", who has defiantly refused to sign said oath, and the deadline is fast approaching. And as his family starts showing up for Thanksgiving, he finds one reason after another to disagree with his brother, his brother's girlfriend and even his parents, who all apparently get their news from different sources as he does. They've all signed the oath, but he hasn't, as a sign of defiance - and around the country protests are turning violent, and certain celebrities who also took a stand against the government policies have begun disappearing. This sounds a lot like the situation with that missing Chinese tennis star who spoke out against a government official recently, so yeah, it could happen. 

When government agents open fire into a crowd of protestors, this news is reported in two very different ways, which calls to mind some of the BLM protests from last year. If you disagree with their cause, then those protestors deserve what's coming to them - but if you agree with them, then they're martyrs whose rights should have been protected. Right? 

But when Black Friday hits, two agents show up at Chris' house - his family lets them in, because he's really been a dick to them for the last few days - and they want to know why he hasn't signed the oath. Liberal (one assumes) Chris points out that the agents have no warrant, and have no cause to be there, so he asks them to leave. Again, he COULD just sign the oath, on paper or the e-version online, but he decides that he needs to make his point - hmm, how did taking a knee during the anthem work out for Colin Kaepernick?  

Everything from this point on sort of falls into the "What else can go wrong?" category, and the standoff between the family and the agents devolves into an illogical situation, and almost feels near the end like the screenwriter painted himself into a corner, however there IS a resolution after the "darkest before the dawn" climax.  I won't spoil it, but again, since this was written in 2018 it feels like a bit of fictional wish fulfillment based on what was happening in the news at that time.

This film may not be perfect, but it's got a lot going for it - like the portrayal of an interracial couple that doesn't keep sticking that fact in our faces, it just sort of is what it is, which makes it feel all right.  And disagreeing with family over politics during Thanksgiving, well, that may not be universal but I think many people would be familiar with this, especially when butting heads with older relatives who are set in their ways and still living according to the social mores of decades past. And it's important to depict the proper way to act as part of the resistance when you disagree with the government - remember, you still have to follow the laws, even the ones you don't like. 

That's it for me this week - tomorrow I'm cooking, delivering food and eating and then setting up my parent's printer on Friday. Back with a new film on Sunday.

Also starring Ike Barinholtz (last seen in "The Hunt"), Tiffany Haddish (last seen in "Like a Boss"), Nora Dunn (last seen in "Tag"), Chris Ellis (last seen in "October Sky"), Jon Barinholtz, Meredith Hagner (last seen in "Horse Girl"), Carrie Brownstein (last seen in "Don't Worry, He Won't Get Far on Foot"), Billy Magnussen (last seen in "Aladdin" (2019)), John Cho (last seen in "Between Two Ferns: The Movie"), Max Greenfield (last seen in "I'm Not Here"), Jon Lovett, Brian Guest, Kevin Rahm, Josh Meyers (last seen in "Fighting With My Family"), Beth Dover, John Ducey, Bruce Boxleitner (last seen in "Tron: Legacy"), Matt Corboy, Priah Ferguson, Henry Kaufman, with cameos from Richard Herd (last seen in "The Mule"), Seth Rogen (last seen in "Zeroville")

RATING: 6 out of 10 slashed tires

Sunday, November 21, 2021

Manson Family Vacation

Year 13, Day 325 - 11/21/21 - Movie #3,983

BEFORE: Well, I really wanted to bookend last week with the two films about serial killers, but my work schedule kind of got in the way - I got called in for extra shifts at the movie theater, which is a good thing, because after today, I've got the holiday week off.  So, I've got to get those shifts in when I can, pretty much if somebody gets sick, I'll take their shift, or somebody has a family emergency, ditto, or if there's a screening arranged at the last minute, they know to give me a call.  I'm a married guy with zero social life, so I'll probably be available.  Yesterday it was a school screening, computer animation from the last two years of alumni, and today, well, it was a guild screening so I can't really talk about it. (film is not yet released, but the audience had a Ball, hint hint)

Jay Duplass carries over from "Horse Girl". 


THE PLOT: Two brothers tour Charles Manson murder sites. One is a devoted family man. One is devoted to The Family. 

AFTER: I get the feeling with this one that some writer started off with the title, and then maybe worked backwards from there. They could have riffed off of any phrase, like "Manson Family Planning" or "Manson Family Affair" or "Manson Family-Owned Business". I guess the Addams Family movies wrecked any possibility of making "Manson Family Values", but other answers were of course possible.  

Of course, it's everything you imagine a film like this would be, since it's about a trip taken to tour all the famous sites in Los Angeles, like the Tate Mansion, the Lobianco house, and that Mexican cafe where Sharon Tate ate her last meal.  And it's a whole lot less, too, because the movie doesn't really take things as far as it could take them, honestly it's a bit of a half-hearted attempt to showcase people who've got an unhealthy obsession with serial killers and the places that they, umm, you know. 

Yes, there are people out there fascinated with this sort of thing - but do we need a film that gives them a name and a voice?  There must be literally hundreds of better ways for people to spend their time rather than go on murder-cations to tour these places, even if it brings them closer to the people they need to drive them there. Me, I'd suggest taking a tour of all the places they filmed scenes for "Return of the Jedi", the Star Wars fan magazine just printed a handy list, and you don't even have to go to Tunisia because they mostly filmed in California and Arizona, you could probably see all the exteriors used for Endor and Tatooine within a week.  But that's just my preference, I know some people would prefer to go to New Zealand and take the "Lord of the Rings" tour - that's fine, you do you. 

But unless you're Quentin Tarantino, I don't know what could possibly be gained by visiting the Manson Family murder sites, but that's what Conrad here keeps suckering his brother Nick into. And Nick keeps falling for it, again and again, because he realizes that's the only way to satisfy Conrad, who's sold all his earthly possessions and moved out to California to work for some kind of "environmental group".  It's also a bit hard to believe that there are still Manson followers out there, because Manson was locked up in prison for SO LONG, his trial took place in 1970, and you'd think that in the 50 years that followed, most of his acolytes would have had to find something better to do. Right? 

It's worth noting that when this film was released in 2015, Charles Manson was still alive - but he died on November 19 in 2017 (DAMN, I missed the anniversary by just TWO DAYS!).  The month of November seems to play a number of important roles in his story - he was born on November 12, 1934, his first parole hearing was on November 16, 1978, and of course, the Beatles released their "White Album" on November 22, 1968.  Yep, that's the album with the song "Helter Skelter" on it. 

It's also worth noting that Charles Manson did champion ecological causes, and a belief system known as ATWA (Air, Trees, Water, Animals) - and those things are important, as we're all sort of re-finding out now that climate change is out of control. And some of Manson's followers engaged in eco-terrorism against those that would pollute the planet - so it kind of pains me to say this, but maybe Charles Manson made a few good points. However, remembering the man for his pro-ecology philosophies is a bit like admiring Hitler as an artist - you're kind of ignoring a lot of important stuff if that's what you choose to focus on. 

This is the second film I've watched this year that mentioned the Sharon Tate murders, the other film was "Zeroville".  And it was last year that I watched "Once Upon a Time... In Hollywood".  I've got one more Manson-related film on my list, "Charlie Says", but I haven't been able to work it in.  I suppose there's always next year - but it would have been great to watch these films a bit closer together, of course. 

Also starring Linas Phillips (last seen in "Lucky Them"), Leonora Pitts, Adam Chernick (last seen in "The Angriest Man in Brooklyn"), Tobin Bell (last seen in "The Quick and the Dead"), Davie-Blue, Suzanne Ford (last seen in "You, Me and Dupree"), Ray Laska, Brent Alan Henry, Matt Bennett (last seen in "Don't Worry, He Won't Get Far on Foot"), Justin M. Rasch, Jonathan Brooks, Isaac Reardon Berger, Orson Chaplin, Amy Adair, Larry Duplass, with archive footage of Charles Manson (last seen in "Zappa"). 

RATING: 4 out of 10 Polaroids (was this set before they invented camera phones?)