Sunday, October 18, 2026
Final Destination 2
Saturday, October 17, 2026
Final Destination
Friday, October 16, 2026
Black Friday
Wednesday, October 14, 2026
The Curse of Bridge Hollow
Tuesday, October 13, 2026
Cursed Friends
Year 18, Day 286 - 10/13/26 - Movie #5,460
BEFORE: I'm suddenly at the crossroads of horror and comedy, because this made it onto the horror list based on the title, but now I'm looking at the cast and realizing that this was a movie made for TV, and it aired on Comedy Central once in 2022 and then never aired again. Well, it's been living on Paramount Plus, because Paramount owns Comedy Central after all. It doesn't look all that great, but we'll see, it's about a curse at least so I've got something to hang my hat on.
If I'm late posting tonight, well, it's my wife's birthday and we're going out to dinner, her favorite steakhouse in Williamsburg, Brooklyn. My birthday is still a week away and we'll be in North Carolina, so I'll get to choose the restaurant then. I'm fine with a Chinese buffet but we'll see.
Harvey Guillen carries over from "Companion".
THE PLOT: Four friends wake up on Halloween and realize the predict-your-future game they played in 2002 is coming true in disturbing ways. They must band together to help each other escape the wild fates that have turned their lives upside down.
AFTER: Sure, this isn't an obvious horror film, like there are no monsters or demons or killer camp counselors, it's a comedy, even though it's not that outright funny. Well, it aired on the COMEDY Channel, didn't it? Yeah, umm, don't forget to make sure your comedy is funny, please take my advice, I know what I'm talking about.
The four friends (OK, three friends and one girl's brother) who hung out in junior high get back together after 20 years apart. Erica's been living in New York City, but she just got a design job for a West Coast company and if she can go full-time she may move back to her hometown - so it's a great time to get back together with Mikayla and Andy, and her brother Josh is squatting in the family home, so anyway, the Core Three (plus Josh) are back together. And they find an old game/book that they used to play, called "M.A.S.H." which stands for Mansion, Apartment, Shack, House - you write down a bunch of choices for yourself in the future, like where you're going to live, who you'll be married to, what your job will be, etc. and then the game eliminates all of the choices but one, and supposedly that's your future. (We used to do something similar when I was a kid, with those folded up pieces of paper with numbers on them, maybe you know what I'm talking about.)
The flashback shows how Erica got the book while trick-or-treating, instead of candy, from that house with the weird-looking lady who maybe was also the author of the book, Stacy Friendship, who maybe also was a witch or a conjurer or a gypsy, all that is a bit unclear. But after they re-discover the M.A.S.H. book and see what their future predicted for them, they wake up the next day and find those situations coming true - like Erica's fate was to become a plumber, and she finds she accidentally packed the wrong Halloween costume, not Princess Peach but Mario, who is a plumber. Mikayla's listing said she would be married to Joey Fatone from N'Sync, and that same day guess who comes into the sandwich shop and flirts with her? Andy's fate was to be married to one of their male teachers, which I'm assuming was a bit odd at the time since he hadn't come out yet, but now seems very prophetic, and sure enough, Mr. Knight is still in town and they keep bumping into him. So the "curse" seems to be that everything that was predicted by the book is (sort of) coming true, or a least becoming a possibility.
Again, it's not outright scary, if anything what scares these adult friends is the fact that maybe they suddenly have no control over their lives, they've done OK for themselves so far in their careers and relationships (well, except for Josh) and to suddenly be under the influence of whatever random dice roll or selection process decided their fate years ago in a Mad Libs-style book, well, sure, that can be a bit frightening. You thought you were making good choices for yourself, and now it turns out that none of that matters, the curse says your life has to be a different way now, if the book said you would hold the record for longest fingernails, well, guess what, that's your life now.
What's a little weird is that they've kind of imposed the "Groundhog Day" rules over this little class reunion, like no matter what Bill Murray tried, he couldn't stop February 2 from starting over again, not until he truly changed inside or had the perfect day in Punxsutawney, PA or whatever. These four learn from another of the book's victims, however, that the poem inside the book demands a sacrifice, one of them is going to have to kill one of their fated spouses in order to break the curse. (They try going to see Mikayla's psychic, Shamrock, to break the curse, but he's pretty useless and also a con artist, of course.). This information is given to them by Lizzie Lennox, who's serving time in an asylum for committing a murder because a book told her to. But she claims that she broke the curse and now her best friend, Nikki Evans, is not a monster truck driver with triplets - except that he actually is, and he claims that there's no escaping the fate that the book has chosen for you. Just learn to live with it, that's the best you can do.
The bad news here is that this film is woefully inconsistent, like it's firing in all different directions at once where the rules of curses are applied. Like does it even count as a curse if you don't mind having super-long fingernails and being in a relationship with Joey Fatone? Maybe there's a downside to that, but then if there is, please show it to us! A lot of the dialogue feels like it was improvised, and the characters also can't keep their own stories straight, like Andy is an overweight fitness instructor in L.A., and how does that even work? And he's obviously gay, but he's also terrified of being gay? This isn't the 1970's, it's very accepted these days, but I guess he has to learn to accept himself. Also do these "friends" even like each other? Because it's often hard to tell, they insult each other all the time and they bear 20-year old grudges, and that's not really a fun look.
Also, did reality really change (twice) or did the four friends all have the same dream? This is very unclear, but they do fall asleep together and wake up together, so you know, it's possible. Hell, even "The Wizard of Oz" couldn't decide if Dorothy really went to Oz or if the whole trip was just in her imagination - I would have voted for it all being a dream, if not for the "Wicked" movie, so umm, thanks for that? But, good news, this is a film that takes place ON HALLOWEEN, like there are Halloween parties all over town that are important to the plot and Mikayla takes her daughter trick-or-treating. Well, there are TWO Halloweens in the film, one from 20 years ago when the friends get the book, and the one in the current day. So great, we're right on track except for the fact that Halloween is still 18 days away. Well, how was I supposed to know?
Directed by Laura Murphy
Also starring Jessica Lowe (last seen in "Desperados"), Nicole Byer (last heard in "The Twits"), Andrew Lewis Caldwell (last seen in "My Best Friend's Girl"), James Austin Johnson (last seen in "Lorne"), Kathy Griffin (last seen in "Mr. Warmth: The Don Rickles Project"), Nikki Glaser (last seen in "Albert Brooks: Defending My Life"), Nicole Richie (last seen in "Summer Camp"), Layla Mohammadi, Sterling Sulieman (last seen in "In Time"), Jon Gabrus (last seen in "Bombshell"), Joey Fatone (last seen in "My Big Fat Greek Wedding 3"), Ken Marino (last seen in "For a Good Time, Call..."), Will Arnett (last heard in "Paul Anka: His Way"), Rob Riggle (last seen in "Big Miracle"), Madeleine Guilbot, Kennedi Butler, Oscar Daniel Reyez, Teddy Gatewood, Colter Lee, Kim Griffin, Aaron Eisenberg, Ari Loeb (last seen in "Zombieland: Double Tap"), Ruha Taslimi, Lela Hoffmeister, Alison Rich (last heard in "The Mitchells vs. the Machines"), Dan Black (last seen in "The Naked Gun"), David Banks, Tanner Swagger (last seen in "Your Place or Mine"), Cayden Romero, Gordon Tarpley (last seen in "Army of the Dead"),
RATING: 4 out of 10 baby goats
Monday, October 12, 2026
Companion
Year 18, Day 285 - 10/12/26 - Movie #5,459
BEFORE: After this I'm halfway through the horror chain for this year - this makes 12 out of 24. But how many horror films have I watched since I started this crazy project/habit? If this is Year 18 that means 17 years have gone before, a quick estimate of 30 films per year would make 510, which seems like a lot. The real number is probably less, because there were some years early on where I skipped the genre entirely, I wasn't really ready to get into it. And then in more recent times I've cut the number down because of vacations taken in October, combined with an inability to form a Shock Block that's more than 25 films long.
A quick search by genre on IMDB's Advanced Search page tells me the number is more like 373, however I have a feeling that's a bit short because I've counted some films as horror films that the IMDB doesn't, they have this category called "psychological thriller" for films that aren't exactly about demons or monsters, films like "A Perfect Getaway" or tonight's film would not count as a horror film on IMDB, but I'll drop it in there. So possibly it's a bit closer to 400 films, which is pretty respectable, considering I didn't much care for horror films when I started this.
Sophie Thatcher carries over again from "Heretic", that film's going to be hard to beat.
THE PLOT: A weekend getaway with friends at a remote cabin turns into chaos after it's revealed that one of the guests is not what they seem.
AFTER: We're going to have to talk about A.I. now, or S.I. or whatever we'll be calling it a year from now. It's nothing new as a topic, we just figured through the 1980's and 1990's that in the future, there will be robots. Nobody saw drones coming back then, or mobile units that would deliver our food, and we imagined flying cars, not self-driving cars, but whatever. Really, "South Park" nailed it when they had Cartman pretend to be a robot named Awesom-O and adults kept asking him if he was a "pleasure robot". The time between humans inventing something and then wondering if they can sleep with it gets shorter and shorter, so yeah, at some point we'll be. combining the Real Dolls with robotics and it won't be perfect, not at first anyway - the only question really is "How soon?"
There are clues from the start that this woman is a robot, she's got an uncanny insight into the weather, speaks many languages and says things like "I just wasn't built that way" even if she's mostly unaware that she is a robot, (or an artificial human, or maybe "synthetic individual" will be in fashion when the time comes). Honestly, I was aiming for the "M3GAN" movie and I kind of missed, I got here first. That other one's harder to link to and I don't imagine the sequel will make it any easier. Iris is programmed to love Josh, and she's programmed with a generic meet-cute memory of how they first encountered each other at the grocery store. As we learned in last night's film, when you remember something you're really basing your memory on the last time you thought of that event, not the actual event itself, but perhaps it's a different story if the memory is a file on your internal hard drive.
There's no year mentioned here, of course, because nobody knows when this technology will be viable, to allow a robot into your home and it cooks for you, does whatever you want (yeah, even THAT) and it showers and dresses itself and believes itself to be human. Over time, it may become self-aware enough to figure out its identity from the clues in the situationship, but it depends on how high you set its intelligence meter. If you want to have intellectual conversations about Tolstoy novels and Bergman films, set the dial all the way up to 100%, but then your "F-bot" might be smart enough to realize it's a robot. Whoopsie, but you can reset it to factory defaults just by holding your thumb behind its right ear for five seconds. Either way, you've got a companion droid that is imprinted on you and you alone, it's not going to cheat on you (umm, unless you want it to, you sick freak) and you can make it do all the cooking and cleaning and grocery shopping - if you're basic and stuck in those outdated gender roles.
You can then go about your business and work late and take time for yourself and not have to worry about your companion, they'll be there for you when you need them, and if you're tired or just want to be alone, you can just say, "Go to sleep" and they'll shut down for a while. You know, it's probably best to keep them on a normal human-like shutdown cycle, it helps their battery life if they recharge on a daily basis.
Josh has "modded" his F-bot, though, sure that's what some people do with their cell phones or computers, but if you're not careful, you could damage the device that way. What Josh did was remove the part of her programming that prevented her from harming humans (through action or inaction), and really that was Rule #1 of robotics, according to Isaac Asimov. Rule #2 was obeying orders from humans UNLESS doing so interfered with Rule #1 and Rule #3 was self-preservation, unless that interfered with Rules 1 & 2. It's important to mention this as we stand on the cusp of the A.I. revolution, and people are randomly making claims that A.I. can "kill everyone" within a certain number of years. THIS is why the industry needs safeguards, as eventually people are going to get tired of just using A.I. to make fake porn and we get more closer to wanting to have actual sex with robots.
Once the safeguards are gone, Iris finds herself in a situation where someone else at the lake house wants to, umm, make use of her talents, and she does not exactly know how to react, she knows that she only wants to be with Josh, so attention from someone else is technically sexual assault, and she defends herself, accidentally un-aliving someone, as the kids say these days on the interwebs. No spoilers beyond this point because I think some of the plot twists are pretty good here, and I'm not going to give them away. But the character remains sympathetic here for a number of reasons, not the least of which is that somebody messed with her programming.
Iris, now aware that she is an artificial being, manages to get Josh's phone in order to use the app to increase her intelligence, now at least she may be able to think her way out of this, rather than be collected by the robot manufacturers and decommissioned or re-programmed. She determines that if she can make it to Josh's self-driving car, she can get home or drive somewhere else and start a new life for herself, only it's just not going to be easy with Josh and others trying to stop her, as part of a larger scheme.
I mean, there's a lot to think about here - we've come a long way since "The Terminator" (there are some obvious visual references here to "Terminator 2") and also a long way from "Ex Machina" - I don't know if we're ever going to get HERE, because films set in the future often act as cautionary tales, and thus they maybe prevent the events depicted from happening. I guess we'll all find out together.
Directed by Drew Hancock
Also starring Jack Quaid (last seen in "Novocaine"), Lukas Gage (last seen in "Smile 2"), Megan Suri (last seen in "72 Hours"), Harvey Guillen (last heard in "The Garfield Movie"), Rupert Friend (last seen in "Jurassic World: Rebirth"), Jaboukie Young-White (last heard in "Ruby Gillman: Teenage Kraken"), Matt McCarthy (last heard in "The Angry Birds Movie"), Marc Menchaca (last seen in "The Creator"), Woody Fu, and the voice of Ashley Lambert (last heard in "The Bad Guys 2").
RATING: 6 out of 10 available language options
Sunday, October 11, 2026
Heretic
Year 18, Day 284 - 10/11/26 - Movie #5,458
BEFORE: Well, I greatly enjoyed my extra day off today, courtesy of the WNBA. No Liberty game today because the Atlanta Dream swept the best-of-five playoff round, instead I got to go to Long Island with my wife where she bought cigarettes, then we did some shopping and had a nice lunch at Texas Roadhouse. I've still got three shifts at the theater before we go out of town for a week, and we've got her birthday this week, I'm hoping to do a focus group to raise a little extra cash, and tomorrow's one of those former holidays that's fallen out of favor.
I'm getting a little worried because the President is talking about doing away with daylight savings time, and I have said in the past that I would support any candidate who would take that position, so now I'm wondering if I have to become a Trump supporter to avoid being called a hypocrite. I think my only possible out here is the fact that he's not suggesting we do it for any logical reason, like the fact that it doesn't save energy or lives, he just wants to scrap it because it's too hard for him to change the clocks twice a year, or he's tired of paying people to do that for him and he's too dumb to figure it out. Another possible out is that he's talking about just keeping DST in place all year round, rather than switching back to Standard Time and staying there, which would make more sense.
I know what you're thinking, it doesn't matter, because he can't run for President again - I firmly believe that he WILL, despite what the Constitution says. And anyway, Presidents are allowed 10 years in office, not 8, which is a codicil in place to help anyone who was a Vice President who became President when someone else died - they can have up to two years after ascending and then serve two full terms. So I think Trump WILL run again, and Michael Bloomberg has already shown him how to do it. Bloomberg was the mayor of NYC for two terms, and then ran a third time, which should have been illegal due to term limits, but he changed his party to Independent, as if that made him a different person or something, and then ran again and won again. Nobody stopped him, nobody sued him, there was no class-action taken against him, and so Trump could easily pull the same trick. By the time the courts settled everything, he'd be midway through his third term. It could happen - now THAT's nightmare fuel.
Sophie Thatcher carries over from "MaXXXine".
THE PLOT: Two young Mormon women are drawn into a game of cat-and-mouse in the house of a strange man.
AFTER: This is a very clever film, all in all. It kind of serves as both a horror film and a treatise on comparative religion, which kind of is the biggest casualty here. After a pair of Mormon women visit a man who says he is possibly interested in converting, they end up debating with him over the finer points of religious theory, and then realize they are essentially trapped in his house, with no means of escape. The front door is locked, and the man, Mr. Reed, says it's on a timer, much like a bank vault, and it can't be opened. Furthermore, there is metal in the walls which prevents their cell phones from working, and one presumes that the house is also sound-proofed and such. Uh oh, this is starting to seem a bit like "The Black Phone".
Sisters Barnes and Preston are welcome to leave if they want, at some point they've figured out that pretty much everything Reed has said is a lie, like he said his wife was in the other room but she's very shy, and she's made them some delicious blueberry pie - but now they're assuming that there's no wife (which means they broke their Mormon rules by entering a house with no woman in it) and even worse, there's probably not any pie, either. Reed suggests they leave via the back door of the house, only they'd have to work their way through several rooms and hallways, and God only knows what might be back there. This guy might have a sacrificial altar or a torture chamber back there, or worse.
But no, it's just a library, and there are in fact two doors in back, but they'll have to choose the right one, and listen to another speech about the true meaning of religion. Yep, that really sounds worse, why couldn't it have been a torture chamber? Reed already knows a great deal about the Book of Mormon, in fact he seems to have studied ALL of the world's religions, allegedly in his search for the best one. But I think something funny happens when you study all of the religions, you might come to the conclusion that they're all false, which sure, seems likely, or even weirder, maybe they're all true. Maybe gods draw their power from believers, so maybe Yahweh and Jesus and Buddha and Satan are all in competition with each other to see who can get the most followers. But that's crazy, right? Anyway if you discount one religion as bunk you kind of have to discount all of them, it's the simplest answer, Occam's Razor, there is no God. The universe came about naturally and science explains the stars and the planets and life exists on Earth only because we're a certain distance from the sun and it developed over millions of years and stopped developing once we had television. Devolution NOW!
Ah, but it's not that simple. After an explanation about the "iterations" of religion that uses both the board game Monopoly and the song "Creep" by Radiohead as touchpoints, Reed offers the women two choices - one door marked "Belief" and one marked "Disbelief". Note that neither one is labeled "Exit". If they believe in religion they should choose accordingly, and if they're willing to admit their religion is bogus, they should choose the other door. Yeah, I pretty much picked up early on the fact that neither door was going to lead them outside. This guy is either a genius or a madman, or possibly both, and he's got a bunch of tunnels in his house that we haven't seen since the Minotaur's maze in ancient Crete, or possibly the passages seen in the film "Barbarian". Why do the stairs lead DOWN? Oh, because he lives at the top of a hill. Sure, and if you believe Moses parted the Red Sea and Jesus walked on water, I suppose you'll believe anything.
It's also worth pointing out that if you don't believe in any of the religions, then you also don't believe in sin, and under those parameters, what evil would someone be capable of doing? There would really be no limit under those conditions, and that's kind of what we're dealing with here. Such a person would kill these women, or rape them, or keep them locked up for his own amusement. Geez, and he seemed like such a nice guy at first, too, but that's kind of the point. What evils lurk in the hearts of man? Only the Shadow knows...and this guy. I don't want to give away too much here, because this really needs to be experienced, but in a way it reminds me of "The Menu" or "Opus" or "The Black Phone" in that one really unhinged person is running the show, however he wants, and all the other people can do is play along and hope to find a way out, choose their moment or whatever. As long as that person has his audience, someone to hear his views on the world and what a messed-up place it is, not to mention that everything you think you know about life and death and the afterlife is probably wrong.
Or is it? Some of the events that follow would seem to suggest that there IS something beyond death, only it's also very possible that it's just another deception, a magic trick of sorts. Which is all that religion really is, in the end, it's not even a magic trick, it's a belief in magic tricks that somebody did thousands of years ago, like appear to die and get resurrected, or appear to turn water into wine or appear to make a blind man see. And then somebody came along and said, "Wow, that was a really good magic trick, I should write that one down because I think we can build a religion around that, and sell people the promise of eternal life while we take their money." Come on, deep down you know it's true. And I say this as someone raised Catholic, I was an altar boy and my father was a deacon and my mother was the church organist. But at some point I decided to think for myself and see that the religion was based on the story of the magic tricks.
To believe that there is no God, other than the one humans created in their stories, yeah, it's truly terrifying. It means that maybe there's nothing after this world, you die and that's it, you're done and there will be things you never got to accomplish and quite possible the world will forget about you unless you did something really spectacular or extraordinary. But that's also very liberating, I mean you can still pray if you want and wish for good things to happen to you or to other people, just bear in mind that nobody is listening and it has no effect on changing reality. It might make you feel good to hope for good things, but it's probably more effective to try and make good things happen yourself. And there's an upside, if there's no God then there's no Satan, no demons or vengeful angels or an eternity of burning in hell or being bored in heaven. Then there are no monsters except savage animals, terrible people and the ones in our imagination.
There is one other possibility, which this film also raises, if only for a few minutes - that the world is a simulation or some kind of advanced computer program that we're all living in, "Matrix"-style. Then if we die in this reality, we're out of the program and we still exist somewhere larger, and that's our true form. Well, either we find a glitch in the matrix and prove that our reality isn't really real, or we just keep on going and we'll find out at the end whether there's anything else. The saving grace is that if there's nothing else, we won't be aware of it, we'll be blissfully unaware. Sorry to harsh your mellow but still feel free to check out the film, it's got some good ideas in it. A lot of bad nasty stuff too, but you know, some good ideas. This is probably the type of film you get after the "Saw" franchise makes a jillion dollars, but I haven't seen those films yet, I've been avoiding them.
Directed by Scott Beck (director of "65") & Bryan Woods (ditto)
Also starring Hugh Grant (last seen in "Paddington in Peru"), Chloe East (last seen in "The Fabelmans"), Topher Grace (last seen in "Under the Silver Lake"), Elle Young (last seen in "A Score to Settle"), Julie Lynn Mortensen, Haylie Hansen, Elle McKinnon (last seen in "Wonder"), Hanna Huffman, Anesha Bailey (last seen in "The Interview"), Miguel Castillo, Stephanie Lavigne, Wendy Gorling,
RATING: 7 out of 10 loose wooden matches







